RE: RE: RE: RE: Montreal conference… If information is being held back from OX management with lame excuses such as the OSK geologist team have not supplied the information, etc,it is more obvious to me that OSK are playing games.This is not how a partnership works and yes this plays into OSK getting OX cheap.Jean Lefleur is now an employee of OSK,as is Alex Horhaith(sp). OX BOD need to regain control of the company direction and need to be bold enough to accept that OSK may not like what must be done.Not much they can do about the existing JV agreement,but OX can hire "their" own expert (independent from OSK) to conduct a 43-101 based upon up to date data,they can independently drill on trend outside of the JV area,they can offer property outside of JV area to other Mid tier,majors.
IF OSK are actually holding back,this is intolerable and diplomacy needs to be thrown to the side.Yes OSK are agressive as demonstated by their past drilling in Quebec,but also shrewd and calculating businessmen that appear hopeful to frustrate shreholders into taking 10% of real value.
PS where is the money that was supposed to be coming into purchasing shares once it was confirmed that OSK was continuing the JV?
I really think OX shreholders would be 1000% better off if OSK just walked away!
Keep this in mind when you are voting your shares in December! PS David Hatchette(Director) is who I will be signing my voting shares over to! David is genuinely invested in turning Goldboro into a producing mine!