GREY:LBEFF - Post by User
Comment by
victor2009on Nov 15, 2010 6:44pm
290 Views
Post# 17709669
RE: Victor2009, Nash's Departure From LBE
RE: Victor2009, Nash's Departure From LBEdoingthejob/aatozz,
You missed the point of my message to you.
My reason for bringing up the fact that you endorsed Randy Miller is not confined to discussion on the ISM forum. It is brought up to demonstrate the quality of your judgement, and why anything you have to say on any forum should be judged accordingly. If you praised Randy Miller for his management expertise, and only weeks weeks later found it advisable to initiate a childish effort to call him to task on his inadequacies - it is a reflection on you, not Miller or ISM. By your own judgement you admitted that your initial assessment was made in haste, and without knowledge of the subject.
As for what ExSudburyGuy2 was trying to tell me, I have dealt with the reasons why I disagree with him. At this point he has not responded to the fact that he was mistaken on where LBE was shipping their nickel. Nor has he responded to explain the rationale behind risking money to invest in a "grocery store", without concern over losing that money, for the purpose of being able to buy "groceries" at your store for the same price you could buy them at Safeway without the risk. It's far too complex an analogy for you, given your lack of knowledge of business and financial matters - but I am awaiting ExSudburyGuy's explanation.
I would think that those truly concerned with the risks involved as minority shareholders, have been aware of the risks since Jilin Jien became involved. They do not require your whining drivel to decide on their assessment. What they might be interested in is a question that has been asked, that none of the bashers are willing to answer, and perhaps don't comprehend - Jilin Jien is not required to exercise their conversion options - what would your assessment be if they did not?