Goodness Gracious Kel, Wrong AgainRule # 8. Copied from our stockhouse "Terms of Use" page, Kel
post on or through any of the Stockgroup Network of Sites, including without limitation any Site Content, Applications and/or Services, any of Your Information, including without limitation User Content (as defined elsewhere in the Agreement), that is or that Stockgroup deems to be false, misleading, unlawful, promoting unlawful or criminal activities, harmful, threatening, defamatory, libelous, infringing, abusive, inflammatory, harassing, vulgar, obscene, fraudulent, invasive of privacy or publicity rights, sexually exploitive, hateful and/or racially, ethnically or otherwise objectionable;
Your post just stated this Kel:
Well Angel / Goldie / or whoever it is that I am talking to, ... 'cause quite frankly I don't know and really don't care, it doesn't mean squat to me, post under any alias / avatar / pseudonym you want - but on that note Angel ....I may be wrong but unless you go by Angelwings1 in real life ( in which case your parents had a wierd sense of humor) , there is no slander/defamation when a "real" person / identity is not the subject.
Excerpts that I find very distasteful & offensive:
Well Angel / Goldie / defamatory YES , running down my posting name angelwings1
(in which case your parents had a wierd sense of humor) hateful YES , defamatory, YES harmful YES
there is no slander/defamation when a "real" person / identity is not the subject. Kel, better read Rule #8 again
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am sure stockhouse may have something to say about your, lack of, interpretation, imo.
I have reported this distasteful post, so we shall see what stockhouse's interpretation is
angelwings
GLTA
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------