Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

VMS VENTURES INC. VMSTF



GREY:VMSTF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by mbgldon Nov 21, 2010 11:33am
377 Views
Post# 17735873

RE: question Reed- Production vs exploration

RE: question Reed- Production vs explorationExactly axegirl1, that's what has this company so excited. Again, a typical resource in the area grows by 2 1/2 times it's initial size once mining begins. As it stands VMS is a small copper deposit at an estimated guess of 2-3 million tonnes according to HBM. So, yes, more drilling is needed. There are 2 things in play right now:

1. The defining of the Reed lake deposit and production of a 43-101.
2. 4 options agreement in which HBM is also the operator and needs to spend 2.6 million to earn 70% in the Northwest , super,Tower, and Northeast Zone option.

Actually in order to address all those properties mention in #2 above, 2 years seems like a fairly short timetable.

Bullboard Posts