Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Active Control Technology Inc ATIVF



GREY:ATIVF - Post by User

Comment by hydra100on Nov 28, 2010 7:25am
301 Views
Post# 17767461

RE: Not Good

RE: Not GoodI thought ACT did a lot with very little.  Contrary to what badactor claims they did a lot of belt tightening which has not only saved them money but will continue to do so.  Of cource he has not read the financials or M/A so he can be excused for not knowing anything about them.

"Little money being spent on R&D."           What part of belt tightening do you not understand?

I think, that although they certainly have made a lot of mistakes, they have done a "good" job with what they had.  I would suggest overall it was "good" news considering what most of us thought was coming.

If they had more money and could pay thier staff more it would have resulted in hiring more sales people and hiring the best. Of cource wages and compensation was not a priority because of a lack of funds.  Contrary to what others, badactor, has posted.

Go back to the post by badactor who posted he was glad they were still hiring when in fact they were laying off.

In thier M/A they tell us still looking for a specialist which MSHA said they have to have.  Job still posted on website unless of cource that even in the face of layoffs you do not think it is that job being posted, like badactor and positive.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>