Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Silk Energy Ltd SLKEF

Silk Energy Limited is a Canada-based resource company. The Company acquires undervalued oil and gas assets in Kazakhstan. The Company, through its subsidiaries, owns a 50% interest in the KMG Ustyurt license (Ustyurt). The Company focuses on exploring and developing Ustyurt, an onshore oil and gas concession comprising approximately 6,500 square kilometers in the Caspian Sea region of the Republic of Kazakhstan.


GREY:SLKEF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by victor2009on Dec 02, 2010 5:27pm
220 Views
Post# 17792357

RE: DoingthejobforAatozz

RE: DoingthejobforAatozzNickel77,

You bring up a good point - "...what it might cost ISM shareholders to oust Randy and pay off his lucrative Parachute Package that was passed by the company.  What might be left in the company coffers if this was paid out?"

That parachute was packed after the last year end - around the time before the AGM, when aatozz and others were finally starting to admit that the world of Inspiration might be a nice place if the old Randy Man took a hike. So that agreement had not been subject to the Auditor's scrutiny.  I'm wondering if it's not required to disclose this parachute package in the financial statements as a commitment and a contingent liability Given the depleting cash position, the parachute is certainly a material amount - it has the possibility of bringing ISM to insolvency.  Will be interesting to see the disclosure.

There's a few other things that the Auditor might be hard pressed to ignore. One thing is the classification of the amount as a current asset - if it's still outstanding, treating it as current may be pushing things.  If it's still outstanding, this amount is also material, and some commentary on collectibility and adequacy of security might be advisable.

Another disclosure consideration is whether the dismal Micon report, and lack of development of the Langmuir property, might warrant a write-down of the costs being carried as an asset.

We're just a month away from the terrible let down of last year's annual financial statements followed by even worse news in the Micon report. A year ago ISM was 70 cents, in January it started it's steady market decline. Release of a year's financial results, with very little to show, could signal more of the same for 2011.

Last year the CEO was rewarded with a 25% increase (to $37,500 per month) for his guidance and leadership. It will be interesting to see what is in store for management remuneration in 2011. If the Micon Report signalled a 25% raise - what might the reward be for the failed spin-out debacle?  

Should be an interesting couple of months coming up.
Bullboard Posts