Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Longford Energy Inc V.LFD



TSXV:LFD - Post by User

Comment by good40on Dec 07, 2010 9:51pm
163 Views
Post# 17815995

RE: ersRE: Why 9 wells? - Answers

RE: ersRE: Why 9 wells? - AnswersEOIM... I haven't noticed any reference provided for your Chia Surkh history.  I'm wondering if you've omitted
anything about production performance,  that is,  how long did these wells continue to produce at initial flush
production rates ?

You wrote,

Chia Surkh wells 1 and 2. Both struck oil at less than 700 m and flowed 180 bopd initial production. The tested oil flow was from the upper formation where the leaked oil from the fractured reservoir in jeribe leaked into before the lower far shale swelled and closed the leak.

In my opinion,  if you neglected to report a very poor steady rate, one that would be definitely considered
non-commercial,  then your intentions are less than honorable.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>