Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Mountain Lake Resources Inc V.MOA



TSXV:MOA - Post by User

Comment by theCurseon Dec 16, 2010 9:08am
293 Views
Post# 17854626

RE: RE: RE: not included

RE: RE: RE: not included

regarding included/not included.  I'd sure like to know who was included in knowing that most of the old holes would not be counted as part of this resource.  I'd also like to know who is included in knowing the "real" resource count with those holes included.  dogs like us are not included in either group.

if it wasn't my money on the line, it sure spins some pretty "after the fact" humour on some of the posts over the last couple of months.

guess CG has slept in this morning.

tC
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>