RE: RE: RE: CONNECT THE DOTSThe only legal background I have is that I paid more thananyone on this board in 2010.... to a tax attorney
I am in fashion…specifically Canadian aboriginal fashion.
I am also a ft educator in Calgary so yes I have a very diverse circleof friends
If I was an insider I would not own in this in my tax freesavings...I would own it in an rrsp and would have picked up on the private placement when it was a .05 shell.
I am extremely bullish on theirfuture.
I would warn you about your HQS which I know well enough tostate I have sold with no regrets.
https://messages.finance.yahoo.com/Stocks_%28A_to_Z%29/Stocks_H/threadview?m=te&bn=51432&tid=3791&mid=3791&tof=10&frt=2#3791
I know enough about thesector to know I have no interest in owning sai because it is a low marginbusiness and suspect of any company that claimed land ownership in PRC.
I might change mymind later in the year when their new plant is closer to production and the stock price is 50% lower.
Presently I see no immediate value in sai.v
fsh has a feed supplier will theychange to sai? I do not know but I wouldNOT be happy if they did change overto sai because that would be a red flag of incest and that insiders would skinoff top….of my shareholder profit.
If no interest in sai makes me arrogant ....I sleep betterwhen I am well read and prudent
I have trimmed or sold many of my US China companies as they have a very organized group of short runners …..somethingthat is makes fsh even more appealing as Canadahas some pretty costly and corporate litigious deterrents to keep them from playing that game in Canada.
On a personal note I am more interested in India but have yet to find manyways to tap that market