Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Longford Energy Inc V.LFD



TSXV:LFD - Post by User

Comment by Baxter4on Dec 23, 2010 1:09pm
206 Views
Post# 17888981

RE: Royalty

RE: RoyaltyYou should really explain how those royalties were determined.

In Niko and Vast's case, both companies had a 27% interest in their block with Groundstar having 6% and the KRG having 40%. The royalty for all was 10%. The KRG Then decided to sell half of its' interest to Niko and Vast. I believe Niko paid cash for their extra 10% and so kept the 10% royalty rate. Vast negotiated a royalty of 30% only applicable on their additional 10% interest, which works out to a royalty of 15% overall for 37% interest. In other words, Vast increased their ownership by 10% while only increasing the royalty by 5%.

Longford negotiated differently. They initially had a 20% WI at a 10% royalty rate. The KRG then gave Longford an additional 20% WI at an overall royalty rate of 40% for a total 40% WI. Not as sweet a deal as Vast got as it works out to a 70% royalty on the additional 20% WI but remember Longford knows for sure they have oil on their block while Vast has only about a 30% chance (assuming the chances of finding oil instead of gas is 50/50 ).

Niko kept their 10% royalty as they had cash. Vast and Longford would have had to go to the market to do the same which would mean a large dilution in shares for both. Paying higher royalties is much better than diluting the shares for shareholders.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>