Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Metanor Resources MEAOD

Metanor Resources Inc is engaged in the production and sale of gold as well as acquisition, exploration, and development of mining properties. It projects include the Moroy Project and Barry project among others.


OTCPK:MEAOD - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by JRaffleson Jan 04, 2011 2:43pm
405 Views
Post# 17923416

RE: RE: news out, MTO is profitable !

RE: RE: news out, MTO is profitable !
What does this all mean? can someone explain in 5 words or less?
tia

In 5 lines, Bachelor would be profitable and generate ~ $96.1m cash flow per year for 3 years, if.....

1. It borrowed $35.4m at 5% interest, which was paid back in the first 10 months of production.
2. The gold price averaged $1271 and production cost $464 per ounce plus $103 admin & sustaining costs.
3. The known 200,000 ounces would be extracted at about 60,000 ounces per year.
4. The Net Present Value of $76.3m inidcates that the bottom line for shareholders would be about $25m per year, based on existing reserves and no reinvestment costs.
5. The 200,000 ounce mine life will probably be extended significantly if cash flow is reinvested to locate new ounces. Also, the surplus cash could be directed towards the Barry development.

There is no indication as to how the $35.5m will be raised and this is critical for existing shareholders, who could be diluted by 70m new shares at
.50 (the plus would be that no 5% interest would be payable).  If this feasibility were to have been produced, say 2 years ago, perhaps only 35m shares at $1.00 sp may have been need to be  raised (gold was lower, but so were costs).  Management's test wil be how they can sell this to an investor in the best interest of existing shareholders (including themselves).  I would not be surprised if there were not a number of funding offers already on the table. Time will tell whether the directors can achieve the right balance between debt and new shareholder equity - at what price. 
Bullboard Posts