RE: procera q4Does anyone agree with a reverse stock split for a company? I know there can sometimes be a case for it however, I still have a hard time understanding why the reverse stock split is seen as a viable option for increasing share holder value or the share price. Death blow in most cases. There's usually a reason why big institutional firms stay away from these companies in the first place and it has nothing to do with a $2 or $5 cutoff policy. Their books are crap. SVC's books were crappy the last 2 years and are only now (past 3Qs) starting to show promise. Procera's books are crap for the last 3 years and have yet to prove themselves. I never like it when a company implies that this will be better for the retail investor long term. Leave the share price where the market has placed it and go from there. Personally, I like where SVC is valued right now ($2.85). If SVC Q4 numbers come in line with predictions (0.03 and 26.8 mil.), I'll be happy at a 3.05 share price. The outlook looks awesome and SVC is moving at a great pace for me. Plus money in the bank of +0.70$/share!!! Awesome!