Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Longford Energy Inc V.LFD



TSXV:LFD - Post by User

Post by good40on Jan 05, 2011 9:21pm
312 Views
Post# 17930762

5k bopd ! Maybe not

5k bopd ! Maybe notSince it was reported to be 4800... in 1936... not developed for some reason... no data available... you don't just
take for granted that it produced a steady rate for a week. 

Why not just produce the well ?  Why bother exploring ?

In any case,  4800 bopd doesn't stay 4800 bopd when you apply a 40% working interest.

Then apply a 40% royalty.

Then apply operational expense.

Then apply tax.

Makes you stop and think,  don't it ?  So let's hope for good reservoir performance,  light oil not heavy,  and
not gas.  Let's hope it wasn't a small pocket they found,  which initially produced and watered out.

You can listen to Maysteeler,  but he said the exact same stuff with ENG a few years back. This is just his
latest flavor of the month.

The company is in a negative working capital position,  shortly before spud.  That has to change,  don't it ?  Let's just close our eyes and tap our heels together,  everything should work out fine.  It still ain't Kansas.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>