Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Trelawney Mining and Exploration Inc TWNNF



GREY:TWNNF - Post by User

Comment by beachmanon Jan 06, 2011 11:25am
514 Views
Post# 17932901

t RE: ANY JUNIOR OR SENIOR

t RE: ANY JUNIOR OR SENIORYes the intersections look impressive but as is stands right now most of those intersections are 300m to 400m below surface.  How many tonnes of waste would have to be removed before you can start mining?  What would the stripping ratio be?

Furthermore we still don't know the geometry or true width of those intersections and they may be grossly overstated.   More drilling on sections with wide intersections is needed. 

Things definitely look promosing but one drill hole could tell the story, good or bad.  For some reason TRR did not complete any step out holes along section during the last round which could have helped resove the issue.  Why didn't they?  The drills were right there. Driller says they were brave to not drill these holes but one could use a different word to describe that decision.  I'd say: enigmatic.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>