Silk Energy Ltd SLKEF

RE: Cruising

[victor2009]

surething1111,

It's very kind of you to reproduce one of the few comments by doingthejob/aatozz that bordered on reality - most would consider that ISM for years, has been much more conservative in its exploration expenditures than in its G&A expenditures - particularly in compensation to its CEO and outsourced IR facilities.

I notice that when you answered whaler's question as to what has happened since the Micon recommendations, he dodged behind the excuse that his question was rhetorical - rather than acknowledge that relatively little has happened.  In checking the meaning of rhetorical I see it means "asked merely for effect with no answer expected".
I don't see much value in a Hub Leader asking questions for which no answer is expected -  I thought a forum was a place for discussion - not a place to throw out questions, but discourage answers. It may be that whaler's years of dealing with Inspiration IR has warped his grasp of why questions are asked. It seems that ISM policy, including that of their IR facility, is that all questions are asked with no answer expected.

Vanchester's idea might be worthwhile, maybe the Hub Leader should be dethroned or impeached, or removed for security reasons, or whatever the fox at Agoracom requires to deal with ineffective leadership. Agoracom prides itself in an operation of which the ancient Greeks would be proud. Surely the ancient Greeks wouldn't want a forum to become a place where an exalted Leader asks questions to which no answer is expected. Carried to that extreme, you'd end up with Leaders running around babbling meaninglessly and accomplishing nothing. That type of  behaviour should be restricted to government, we don't want it creeping into the forums of the  "leading online investor relations firm that caters to the IR and Marketing needs of small and mid cap public companies trading on the TSX, TSX Venture, NYSE Alternext, AMEX, NASDAQ, OTCBB, OTCQX, AIM and Frankfurt."