RE: RE: RE: Why Archer's Selling?touareg,
What do you strongly disagree about?
"Irrational fear"? - Are you kidding me?
If it is the fact that Archer's selling has no impact on the short-term share price of ATAC as I explained before then I think you are sadly mistaken. If you are twisting my words to imply somehow that I am pessimistic about ATAC's intermediate and long-term propspects and share price then you are very dishonest. That is because you know privately as I have disclosed to you previously and publicly if you go through my previous posts on this board the very sizeable number of shares I hold (over half of my portfolio).
I have respected you previously and have said so publicly on this board based on your long-term valuable contributions. But you should not rest on your laurels and let that get to your head as "everyday is a test of your character". When you called me "dum" on your reaction to my first post about this issue where I stated my position and supporting evidence / logic it became obvious of your defensive attitude as though it was a personal attack. I am convinced of this even more when you brought up the issue of me encouraging investors to suggest to ATAC more property acquisitions along the Osiris claims shortly after their drill results came out. I call that being an active shareholder and looking after your interests and not assuming management always knows best. You are calling it "hassling". How do you know that my insistance was not actually instrumental in staking more claims or that they would not have been beaten to it by others if they had acted on it without my (and others similar to me perhaps) urging them? What if ATAC had more investors urging them about this matter and had staked more claims and then optioned them out (like SMD did)? You take too many things for granted and are too comfortable with yourself.
You as well as some others should stop looking at these boards as territories where you set up a pecking order instead of a place for open and honest debate based on weighed evidence to help maximize the return on our investment. Let the larger audience (many of them unspoken) decide who "those short-sighted swellheads creating an increasingly uncritical echo chamber developing here" are.