Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Comment by shellfish1on Jan 24, 2011 11:51pm
254 Views
Post# 18020830

RE: OUCH !!!

RE: OUCH !!!

A new miner won’t make money by mining thermal coal in the short and middle terms, because of the low profit margin and the significant initial capital cost. NAG is not an exception.

Before NAG can mine blue gem on a commercial scale, the mines, no matter how many NAG can run at a time, won’t even self-sustain, and yet will represent significant cash drains. On top of that, NAG also needs some $600,000 every three months as working capital for doing nothing meaningful. Accordingly, losing money is likely the main theme of NAG for years to come. No wonder it is a “sell” recommendation by TJ.

It is too bad a decision to put money in NAG. Trying to find a way out before it is too late, but the management kills the run each time.  

Shellfish  

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>