Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

First Uranium Corporation T.FIU



TSX:FIU - Post by User

Post by idunnobuton Feb 04, 2011 2:05am
475 Views
Post# 18074048

Gold is up a little -- NPV calculation

Gold is up a little -- NPV calculationFIU says they will be able to mine 6.8M oz of gold from 2011 until 2029, and I believe them. What's the value of a $20 increase in the price of gold per ounce, assuming (1) they are already profitable before the increase (2) this price increase is not followed by an increase in mining costs (3) the increase is permanent (4) the cost of capital is 15%.

$53 Million ($9M x 15 years discounted)

The market cap of FIU could have (should have?) reasonably moved up by $53M (a small upwards adjustment of
.29)  but it didn't, so either the shareholders of FIU don't care about the price of gold, or maybe there is a complete disconnect between the shareholders selling and buying this stock and the value of the mine. If the probability of failure for FIU shareholders is near 100%, shouldn't the short position be higher?

Show me some conviction, and maybe I'll change my mind.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>