Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Longford Energy Inc V.LFD



TSXV:LFD - Post by User

Comment by digitson Feb 06, 2011 12:42pm
171 Views
Post# 18083679

RE: RE: RE: Keys Facts we know Till Date

RE: RE: RE: Keys Facts we know Till DateYes, a REALISTIC post. Among other things it touches on the inherently difficult drilling conditions that exist in this region. Something that the terrible trifecta here have NEVER touched on. As a matter of FACT they have never touched on anything of the negative nature here at all. Hmmm ... why is that?

Hardly an objective group are they? Again ... why is that? Well ... anyone with a bit of grey matter betwixt their ears can see why.

Is this stock 3 dollars yet? If not why not? Ah yes ... questions.

And then there is the SOROS issue. Did any of the terrible trifecta mention that SOROS has been convicted of insider trading? source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Soros

Not exactly something that a "pump squad" like the "terrible trifecta" would mention is it? Why not? If they were as honest as they paint themselves to be shouldn't that be deemed as something of importance?

They are right about one thing ... SOROS is here for the money. The question is ... "is he in the money already"? If so, I would hate to be in this stock if he pulled out at the first signs of trouble. This thing would plummet so fast that a speeding bullet couldn't catch it. Just ask the bagholders at SRU about a "bullboard boiler room gang" that pumped billionaire Seymour Schulich owning shares in a stock. They went from over a dollar to .06 cents.

Just because a billionaire owns stock doesn't automatically make it a sure thing. Those of you that think differently are in deep doo doo.

BTW ... At least Seymour Schulich was squeaky clean.

I will let the blind faithful dwell on that. Or will they? Judging bythe posts I read by the cheerleading squad on this board I one can seethat the PT Barnum effect is in full swing on this board
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>