Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

La Mancha Resources Inc LACHF



GREY:LACHF - Post by User

Post by RedHorizonon Feb 10, 2011 6:55am
717 Views
Post# 18107418

2013 Valuation

2013 Valuation
LMA claims that in 2013 the VMS will be in production and that adding that will give them 220,000 ounces of company wide production.  So my "back of the envelope" calculation is:

Cash cost of $593 which is based upon 130,000 ounces at $671 & 90,000 ounces from the VMS at $482 - see slide 19 for that.

So, the cash margin per ounce is $1360 (today's gold price) minus $593 = $766.  Let's be conservative again and call it $750 per ounce of EBITDA.

220,000 x $750 = $165 million per year.

LMA's current fully diluted market cap is $385 million.  So LMA is trading for 2.2 x 2013 projected 2013 EBITDA.  This also assumes no increase in the gold price between now and then.

LMA of course has to do what they say they will do in terms of getting the VMS into production at the aforementioned cash cost.  But assuming that they do what they say they can do, I am not aware of any producing gold miners who are cheaper than this.

GLTA
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>