Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Trelawney Mining and Exploration Inc TWNNF



GREY:TWNNF - Post by User

Comment by beachmanon Feb 11, 2011 12:43pm
400 Views
Post# 18117416

RE: RBC Coverage

RE: RBC CoverageBased on where we stand right now, the analysts are right.   Correct me if I'm wrong but section 91 or 92 only has one hole plugged into it.   If one believes however, like I do, that the widths and grades on sections 89 to 92 can be maintained over thicknesses of 400m or greater, like sections 93 and 94, then you can infer 5 million ounces.

I would also think that the report would have written before the update of the map and sections that show exactly where the latest drilling was and how it changed the picture.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>