Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

LAKE SHORE GOLD CORP 6.25 PCT DEBS T.LSG.DB



TSX:LSG.DB - Post by User

Comment by Golfcar72on Mar 02, 2011 3:23pm
618 Views
Post# 18220853

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: TheAce..V.PRB is the one!!

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: TheAce..V.PRB is the one!!TheAce -

I like your enthusiasm for the video and the potential, but please keep in mind the outstanding shares when doing a price comparison. 

Yes, Rainy River is about $12 ($12.35 as of 3pm EST), but their shares outstanding are 82 million. 
LSG on the other hand has over 370 million shares outstanding.  That's 4.51x the share base.

Divide Rainy River's price of $12.35 by the 4.51 multiplier and you get a paltry $2.73 per share valuation at your estimate of 5 million oz.  Based on that math, if LSG get's to 6 million oz a valuation would be $3.28 per share for LSG stock.

Again, using all of your market math that puts the number of projected oz. driving LSG's current price at 7.5 million oz., which I'm sure the consensus believes is an understatment of future reserves but a reasonable investment gamble on future proven reserves.

I know it's unpopular on the board, but I'll still reaffirm my goal of a $6-7 price target in the next few years.  I'd like to be more optimistic, but the number of outstanding shares is simply too large to support a higher price per share.  It would taken proven future reserves of over 15 million ounces (assuming a stable gold price) to send this price over $10.  I hope they can find it and mine it, but until then I'll stick to a more conservative valuation.

Is a 50% return on assets in 2-3 years a bad thing?  I certainly hope not!

Good things,
Golfcar72

Bullboard Posts