RE: RE: curious on whyPerhaps that is the reason...!
" So if the majority of the sample are in area were the 8 meters penetration is sufficient then, you plan your programme around that fact...
The reason the extension struck me so was that later in the report it stated something about the possibility of a higher concetration of doamonds closer to the bedrock. i.e. if we could have gone deeper we MAY have had better results. We may not have either. As I said, there must have been a reason and perhaps your suggestion is valid.
Dang, are one of those investors that does not question anything. It is good to bedate things. I did NOT ridicule anyone, including management on my last 3 posts. I simply stated something on the board that struck me as odd. Read my post again, I did state that there must be a reason!
Are you IR or closely affiliated with AFA management?
The news is great that the next round of sampling is about to commence. Now to state something that will likely excite you again...
I hope that the results on this new sampling will come out quickly after completion.