Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Afri-Can Marine Minerals Corporation V.AFA



TSXV:AFA - Post by User

Comment by FKlosteron Mar 17, 2011 7:57am
379 Views
Post# 18297470

RE: RE: RE: RE: curious on why

RE: RE: RE: RE: curious on whyThanks for the reply. Although the latter comments are uncalled for.

As I stated before on other posts it is my OPINION that management is overpaid. I still contend this to be true.

As far as you implying I did not read the last news release - you are wrong on that. What did I say that was untrue/bull?

What was untrue/bull- answer that.
The news release did state that an extension was available but not installed. NOWHERE in the news release did it provide a reason for it not being installed. I could have asked management directly but decided to post it on this board for discussion. That is what a board is for, for people to discuss the stock. There will always be mistakes by some posters, sometimes accidentally some times on purpose. There is nothing wrong with other posters correcting those mistakes and other posters adding to one's comments.

So, now, since you insinuated that I did not read the news release, where in my recent post did I state something FALSE? The release DOES mention that there could have been a higher concentration deeper in the sampling zones. Does it not? I cannot cut and past on acrobat reader to post here.

I also mentioned in my post that the sampling could go to 8 meters and the extension would enable it to go to 12 meters. That was indeed an accurate statement was it not? I guess I did read the report. C'mon admit that I read it accurately.

Thanks for posting Pierre's reply. I do appreciate that as I am sure others do as well. Perhaps that kind of an explanation in the report would have been a good idea? Also, it would be good for management to explain to us shareholders the intention...
"section. The extension adds operational time at sea and lower the number of samples. However, we gater the information about the areas that shall be drilled down to 12 meters and revisit these sites in further programs"

I will always question management in any company I invest in. That is a good thing to do. It has allowed me to LEARN alot. I have made many mistakes. Regardless of your posts I will continue to voice my concerns and displeasures. I hope others will as well.

I am absolutely sure you are a good investor that has complete faith that AFA management has made all the right moves with this company.( i truly mean this , I am not "needling" you)  You have also stated your belief that they are appropriately paid-I disagree. You may wish not to question anything, I will though.

Have a good day ARPAGON.



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>