RE: RE: insider movematalex...you seem to have unclear interest in coming here to b*tch against Veilleux. I assume you're one frustrated ex-shareholder of Raymor and found out about Robex and Veilleux role into it. I'm not a Veilleux' fan myself, but your link between the 3 parties is weak and your link to insider trades is proving you wrong by the sense that Veilleux has invested a good chunk of cash in rbx since 2008 and actually owns more than 12,000,000 shares as of today (shares paid between 3.5 and 15 cents through open mkt and options/warrants exercise) and a couple million options on top of that. you and I can not understand exactly what happened with raymor veilleux and cie, but i know for a fact that he's been a serious cash provider to robex so far...so I prefer him on board at this point. when YOU read the articles you provided (and I can provide you more of it if you wish!), durst and 2 other guys (veronneau and perez)were part of the cash providers at raymor...do you really know what happened between the 4 of them and raymor?...get your facts straight and get back to this board before throwing out stuff that you don't have a clear understanding of. that is pretty serious stuff and I'm not sure what veilleux would do about it. there are always 2 sides to a coin!
Rob