Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

North American Gem Inc V.NAG



TSXV:NAG - Post by User

Comment by lalala1on Mar 18, 2011 10:53am
303 Views
Post# 18304873

RE: GOOD PICS on NAG .....................

RE: GOOD PICS on NAG .....................The statements you posted
NORTH AMERICAN GEM INC.

INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2010


are over 6 months old and are for the Three months ended September 30, 2010... so those statements are for July 1, 2010-september 30, 2010.

And since NAG only started mining Mine 2 on 8/4/2010
North American Gem Inc. has Commenced Mining Blue Gem Coal at the North American Gem #2 Mine

the expenses would include getting everything ready to mine and the company they had mining it couldn't handle it hence the reason they brought on M3 after September 2010. Thus the revenues would be low and the expenses would be high.

Do you have the statements for the years end? If not based on the 2 pieces of information 1/2 a year old statements or weeks old pictures I would prefer to go on the pictures.

IMO

Do you have the statements for the years end? If not
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>