RE: RE: RE: RE: Pointless Post?
Mooreman:
Thanks for the copper update. I was following the same train of thought regarding the two properties, but my limited geology made it difficult to see how these two properties could be related and one not have copper. In any case the SJ copper values are very good!
So, if they are related....could it be that the two are what I might surmise to be two separate super-gene or surface deposites, connected beneath by the hypo-gene that is common to both? If that is the case the deeper hypo-gene is always much larger (10X in some cases) and had the higher mineral content and possibly we haven't even scratched the potential of that ore body?? I believe it is oxides at the surface and sulphides below?
I will be eagerly looking forward to the "deep" drilling results which if I'm not mistaken have "hit" sulphide mineralization!
So if the deep sulphides contain some copper...will that be a good indication of the above or that there is a mother zone of one common source for both ore bodies? I find that possibility intriguing!
Again....thanks for the clarification.....update.......correction...much appreciated.
Solver