Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Canstar Resources Inc V.ROX

Alternate Symbol(s):  CSRNF

Canstar Resources Inc. is a Canada-based mineral exploration company. The Company is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties located in Canada. The Company’s flagship exploration project is the Golden Baie project in south-central Newfoundland. The Golden Baie project is the Company’s flagship precious metals exploration asset. Its 100%-owned Golden Baie Project (548.75 square kilometers) hosts 93 kilometers (km) of a structure similar to Newfound Gold's QueenswayGold Project. Its Buchans-Mary March projects (65.75 square kilometers), which include a Glencore joint venture, are located within the past, producing VMS zinc-copper-silver rich Buchans Mining Camp and boast high-grade zinc and copper discoveries. The Buchans-Mary March Project is located in central Newfoundland, 20 km northeast of the same geological group that hosts the former producing Buchans Mine. Its wholly owned subsidiary is Altius Minerals Corporation.


TSXV:ROX - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by svosteveon Mar 28, 2011 7:21am
460 Views
Post# 18348538

lazy judge motion??

lazy judge motion??I wonder if this motion can be carried out in Canada before we go under a dime?

The “lazy judge” motion takes the case away from the judge automatically. All you have to show is that the hearing occurred on a certain date, and the judge didn’t render an order by the time the legislature says he had to. In this particular case, I was happy to get the case away from that court.

Most of the time, a “lazy judge” motion isn’t a good choice. It does cause the case to be assigned to a new judge, which in some cases, like the one I described, can be a good thing. However, the only recourse you have once a new judge is appointed is to try the case again. This is all right from the stand point that you can introduce evidence that may have been missed the first time around. However, it also means you have to pay an attorney to prepare the whole case for you again, and most people simply can’t afford to do that.

https://www.goinglegal.com/article_1424943_18.html

Bullboard Posts