Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

High River Gold Mines Ltd HRIVF



GREY:HRIVF - Post by User

Post by 1marketmakeron Mar 31, 2011 5:57pm
367 Views
Post# 18369939

Fixed table structure-Hope this works.

Fixed table structure-Hope this works.
All you need to know if that they made over $200 million...and the reason for the INCREASE is gold ounce costs was because THEY WERE SPENDING MONEY to increase product and fix all the earlier issues we had before.
BREAK DOWN
Look how much MORE we spent this year over 2009 and where it was spent.
--------------------------...........2010 2009
Property, plant and equipment ....................(40,740) .........(25,798) (15M more)
Exploration properties and deferred
exploration ................................................(17,110) .........(8,484) (9M more)
Purchase/sale of other long-term assets....... (7,810) ............168 (8M more)

Fair value adjustments to financial
instruments ................................................(13,684)............ 1,917 (15M more)

Mining costs.............................................. (25,081) ............(4,482) (21M more)


THIS ADDS UP TO 69 MILLION DOLLARS. 
$69 Million divided by 329,921 ounces of gold = $209 MORE per ounce. But, they 
MADE MORE MONEY TO OFFSET THIS.
So this is a company REBUILDING, With $154 million in cash, cash flow of $156 million and huge production 
increases coming up. 
So if we need to spend $69 million more to get us there, I'm all for it. This has turned into a long haul.
But one which I know is headed in the proper direction.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>