What I Don't Understand
...can someone explain why the LOGM case decision caused a $1.39 drop in s/p, when in fact, the reason for the $1.80 s/p was based on the CTXS case? To me, that would translate into the CTXS case having little or no value when in fact it was that case that accelerated the s/p to where it was, $1.80 or so. According to the WW report, the LOGM was a sort of a bonus case that would drive the s/p to loftier heights, $3 or so. I would have expected this kind of drop if it was CTXS that won, not LOGM. Any thoughts and explanations would dearly help to get a handle on this situation.
Thanks any01.
...have a gd 01
...g-g