Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc TZWLF



GREY:TZWLF - Post by User

Post by sherbet2on Apr 11, 2011 4:47pm
243 Views
Post# 18415703

Many questions; yet no …

Many questions; yet no …

 

Hello everybody,

 

As previously suggested, “…choosing to affix a very large “FIRE SALE” sign over the remaining Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc/Aperto Networks enterprise assets

Well, sufficed to state that such a measure could in fact be long overdue.

 

Hmm; does Mr. Patrick N. Smith, the newly appointed Chairman of the Board of Directors, just so happen to have a plan which could involve placing a “FIRE SALE” sign over the remaining Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc/Aperto Networks enterprise assets?

Moreover, would you expect that the majority of independent directors could choose to support any existing plan to pursue and finally consummate a sale, i.e. an in part or in whole sale, of either the Aperto Networks subsidiary or Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc?

 

Hmm, perhaps in conjunction with and as would follow with the immediately aforementioned potential sale of the Aperto Networks subsidiary, the remaining assets held by Tranzeo Wireless Technologies Inc could be “merged” with a profitable company?

Once again, “would anybody care to be subjected to experiencing a “reverse takeover” maneuver which could perhaps be proposed by or on behalf of the very ‘stakeholders’ currently vested of a certain perhaps long interested and yet privately operating corporate entity?”

 

Finally, one will once again ask you, Freakinidiot, the immediately following questions.

 

“When exactly had the supposed sale of company assets (as you had clearly suggested, Wilan associated intellectual properties or patents had been sold) occurred; and why had there not been a company press release issued describing such sale?"


What’s more, do you know whether such a sale of “company assets” had been negotiated at
fire sale prices; and do you just so happen to know whether the Wilan patents in question had been returned to a private entity which has in any way been associated with or influenced in any way by or on behalf of Mr. James A. Tocher or a selected “intermediary?”

Hmm; could the ‘Wilan patents sale transaction in any way be associated with and linked to Mr. James A. Tocher recently electing to step down as Chairman of the Board of directors and Mr. Patrick N. Smith being appointed as the ‘independent’ Chairman of the Board of directors?

 

Sherbet2

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>