RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 3D Chargeability Model - Wow!!Chappy,
Your post this morning was very very interesting. Thanks for posting the link to the prior conversation with Rockaur. Based on his wisdom, almost everyone on this board has been misunderstanding the significance of "Big Red". So, the real importance of the Interpreted Cross Section diagram is not "Big Red", rather, it's "Big Dirty Orange". Thus, hole CF405 did not miss the target at all -- the drill hole hit it bang on.
So, If I was correct in my earlier post that the Chargeabiltiy Model shows a zone that lies somewhat east of the traditional Schaft Creek deposit, then "Big Dirty Orange" on the Interpreted Cross Section, being about 300 m in diameter, might be somewhere around the "Root Zone" area on the Model.
And if Rockaur is correct, then the coppery blobby thing on the Chargeabiltiy Model is not solid at all -- it's more like a huge chocolate Easter bunny lying on its side under Mt La Casse -- full of yummy goodness on the outside, but hollow on the inside. Your thoughts?