Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Copper Fox Metals Inc V.CUU

Alternate Symbol(s):  CPFXF

Copper Fox Metals Inc. is a Canadian resource company focused on copper exploration and development in Canada and the United States. The principal assets of the Company and its wholly owned Canadian and United States subsidiaries, being Northern Fox Copper Inc. and Desert Fox Copper Inc., are the 25% interest in the Schaft Creek Joint Venture with Teck Resources Limited on the Schaft Creek copper-gold-molybdenum-silver project located in northwestern British Columbia and the 100% ownership of the Van Dyke oxide copper project located in Miami, Arizona. Its other projects include the Eaglehead Project, the Sombrero Butte Project, and the Mineral Mountain project. Eaglehead is an advanced exploration stage polymetallic porphyry copper project located about 50 kilometers (km) east of Dease Lake in the Liard Mining District, British Columbia, within Tahltan territory. Sombrero Butte is a Laramide age, exploration stage, porphyry copper project located in the Bunker Hill Mining District.


TSXV:CUU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by imerc23on May 07, 2011 4:40pm
454 Views
Post# 18545003

RE: RE: RE: Question

RE: RE: RE: QuestionChappy, re your recent post:

One constraint is the tailings.  There are 3 tailings options in theinitial pre-feasibility study but there has always been one clearfavourite: Option A, Skeeter Lake.  With the original resourceengineering, the Option A scenario would require a 200m high dam on thenorth end of the Skeeter valley.  If we double or triple the amount oftailings processed this scenario will require some significantre-engineering of a very significant structure.  It could be that thereis an upper limit that may constrain the overall project.  The othertailings options have some significant geophysical hazards that may betoo risky to be realized. 

Outstanding idea.  I'd overlooked this issue completely.  You've done excellent research, once again.
Bullboard Posts