RE: RE: RE: RE 43-101 BLINDSIDEDSpoken like a real MOZ supporter.
If the 2005 43-101 that was held out to be the strong indicator of what VL has for mineable resource is to be discounted as having no value and the expertise and worth of the geologist that submitted it brought into question., my question would be why should anyone pay any more attention to the 2011 43-101 and the geologist that submitted it.
The point being that by ingnoring the 2005 43-101 they have sent a very confusing message to the market and I think a drop of 50% in SP and several million shares dumped over the last 5 months would suggest others agree.
In my opinion its time for Gary Woods to start earning his pay and look after MOA share holders.