RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: POET in the middle of a HUWell again I seemed to have struck a chord which shouldn't suprise me. You have again shown no logical rebuttal to my claims and instead have insisted on sidestepping obvious open discussion. If you can't respond to these inquiries openly and honestly then please admit that you don't have the answers and admit that you are playing a very speculative game with consequences that could be financially devestating for your readers. Again you are taking this way too personally to be able to have an open and honest discussion.
By the way, I do have a wide variety of stocks in diffuse areas of energy, health and communications technology. I have a certain number of stocks in OPEL because I feel ( speculating of course) that OPEL will be one of the leaders in the solar arena. I may even have a very small interest in the POET end of things and hope that that will result in higher share prices. And I have gleaned a lot of my information from you and others. However, would I risk my life's savings on a remote possibility that POET will bring me boat loads of cash- not a snow ball's chance in hell. And I certainly would not act as irresponsibly, as some posters have been on this site, to try to sell this technology as a done deal and a proven pot of gold.
Read very carefully all the posts and try to dispute the fact that the preponderance of sentiment on behalf of the pro-POET camp has been to instill an overwhelming over- zelous and one sided favouritism towards POET without regard to objectivity and to prevent the reader from gaining a proper perspective on exactly where POET lies in the all important realm of profit in the real world. And please respond without the unprofessional personal remarks that certain posters seem to make when they are unwilling to come to terms with the possibility that their judgements may be incorrect and without merit.