RE: RE: RE: Sal_Bando.....perhaps this might help.But this conflicts with the size of the deposit in the report! Is Graham now saying that the dimensions in the report are incorrect? To me this is what he seems to be saying. You can't have it both ways. Either the dimensions in the report are correct or they are not. If they are correct then you cannot bring in extraneous shapes and talk about the ore in the deposit being smaller. If they are not correct then we have to ask why the report is incorrect. I am NOT questioning the 43-101.