Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

ProShares Short SmallCap600 T.SBB


Primary Symbol: SBB

The investment seeks daily investment results that correspond to the inverse (-1x) of the daily performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. The fund invests in financial instruments that ProShare Advisors believes, in combination, should produce daily returns consistent with the funds investment objective. The index is a measure of small-cap company U.S. stock market performance. It is a float-adjusted, market capitalization-weighted index of 600 U.S. operating companies selected through a process that factors in criteria such as liquidity, price, market capitalization, financial viability and public float. The fund is non-diversified.


ARCA:SBB - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by bot_feederon Jun 02, 2011 8:47am
237 Views
Post# 18660946

RE: RE: cash

RE: RE: cashstinkpad:

As to Hackett River my recollection is that they recently discussed looking into joint venture deal to develop that property.  I think they were hiring an outside consultant to assist them on that.  My thinking is that a JV deal might be something along the lines of granting a mining company a 50% interest in exchange for the partner funding the development of the mine.  Since I believe the NAV for Hackett from their past economic analysis was about $1 billion, and my guess is the cost to build a mine would be about $1 billion, a 50/50 split would seem about right.  I would guess some of the most interested parties would be from China, I'm not sure the political implications in Canada for Chinese acquisition of what I suppose is perhaps the largest undeveloped silver deposit in Canada(?), but I would think if there is any problem with 100% acquisition, I bet a 50/50 situation would be found acceptable by the Canadian govt.

I get the feeling that with Back River they may be thinking more along the lines of developing it themselves.  It is my impression that the capital cost is a lot less than to develop Hackett.
Bullboard Posts