RE: Proactive's Report April 5/11webgogs, you wrote in part: "Lots of people asked me for pictures for the write up. Now we have them. Thanks Chappy"
Sorry, what write-up? I'm familiar with the article which you referenced in your message - excellent but, if there's been a discussion about enhancing it or updating it with a "write-up", I've missed it. Much as I appreciate the superlative posts and information supplied by you and others on this forum, I thought the whole point of investing in CUU was that we didn't need media attention. Teck knows the story already and, I assume, any other interested potential partners/buyout companies. I'm sure media attention wouldn't do any harm, and may even do some good for those trading a portion of their holdings - I'm not one of them - but any rise in the sp gained through more media attention isn't going to make any difference to what the final buyout price will be, will it? Correction welcome.
One more thing: webgogs, like yourself, Vette is one of the most valued contributors to this forum but I note in an earlier post today that he claims that the RE is coming "this week". I do wish he'd stop saying things like that. For the last couple of months I've come to expect NR's only when they actually get posted by the company, not when individuals who shouldn't be getting information from the company before any other shareholders say that they're coming. Maybe Vette just means he hopes it's coming this week; I'll go along with that - I hope so too! If Vette *really knows* it's coming this week and he's a regular retail shareholder, he shouldn't have access to that information, and I hope the OSC or its BC equivalent isn't watching because I value my investment too much to have it screwed up by an investigation into CUU info trading.