Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Response Biomed Corp RPBIF

"Response Biomedical Corp is engaged in the research, development, commercialization and distribution of diagnostic technologies for the medical central-lab testing, point of care (POC) testing and on-site environmental testing markets."


GREY:RPBIF - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by dimar66on Jun 13, 2011 12:03pm
338 Views
Post# 18707314

b

b
We could have used good news on this, but it has been so long in the works most people have given up expecting anything.  So it is mostly factored into the share price already.
Vancouver, British Columbia, June 13, 2011 – Response Biomedical Corporation (TSX: RBM,
OTCBB: RPBIF) announced that it has received a notification from the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) that its NTproBNP Assay did not meet the criteria to obtain a waiver under
the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA).
“We are obviously disappointed in the position of the US FDA in this matter, and would emphasise
that this decision in no way diminishes the current perception of this product in the marketplace.”
said S. Wayne Kay, Chief Executive Officer. “The performance of our RAMP® NT-proBNP Assay
has consistently been shown to be clinically concordant with that of the Roche Elecsys proBNP
Test. The regulatory criteria for CLIA waiver have become significantly more stringent over the
past few years, raising the bar to a level that few quantitative tests for clinically critical analytes may
be able to achieve going forward.”
Bullboard Posts