Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Seafield Resources Ltd V.SFF



TSXV:SFF - Post by User

Comment by jrock83on Jun 15, 2011 3:44pm
209 Views
Post# 18720309

RE: 1,582,105 ounces gold at Miraflores

RE: 1,582,105 ounces gold at MirafloresKeep in mind they used a much lower cut off grade than what seems to be standard practice. I would say they are closer to 1,100,000 ounces which still makes SFF very undervalued especially considering they will have much more than that down the line.

I am interested in hearing Lopez. The previous CEO seemed so disinterested in talking with shareholders... almost as though he was doing us a service.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>