Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Copper Fox Metals Inc V.CUU

Alternate Symbol(s):  CPFXF

Copper Fox Metals Inc. is a Canadian resource company focused on copper exploration and development in Canada and the United States. The principal assets of the Company and its wholly owned Canadian and United States subsidiaries, being Northern Fox Copper Inc. and Desert Fox Copper Inc., are the 25% interest in the Schaft Creek Joint Venture with Teck Resources Limited on the Schaft Creek copper-gold-molybdenum-silver project located in northwestern British Columbia and the 100% ownership of the Van Dyke oxide copper project located in Miami, Arizona. Its other projects include the Eaglehead Project, the Sombrero Butte Project, and the Mineral Mountain project. Eaglehead is an advanced exploration stage polymetallic porphyry copper project located about 50 kilometers (km) east of Dease Lake in the Liard Mining District, British Columbia, within Tahltan territory. Sombrero Butte is a Laramide age, exploration stage, porphyry copper project located in the Bunker Hill Mining District.


TSXV:CUU - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Post by Awardedon Jun 21, 2011 7:44pm
452 Views
Post# 18747122

New zones and earn-back

New zones and earn-back

Great News!

“The High Resolution Airborne Magnetic Survey covered a 25 kmlong by 17 km wide area.” (i. e. 425 sq. km = 42,500 hectares).Within that, “The area of "explorationinterest" is an elliptical shaped zone (approximately 4 kms wide by 20 kmslong) ….” (i. e. 80 sq. km = 8,000 hectares).


“Copper Fox holds title and a 100% working interest in a contiguous 24,003.5 hectare(59,311 acre) property which includes the Schaft Creek deposit….”Although the 8000 hectare area of “explorationinterest” falls within the size of CUU’s 100% working interest, it is unlikelythat all of that area is within.CUU surveyedbeyond their boundaries. Some of the “exploration interest”is on unclaimed land or land claimed by others.See Chappy’s map

https://www.flickr.com/photos/60356448@N04/5662015068/in/photostream


The Schaft Creek deposit is on the original claims whereasthe ES and GK zones are on the recently acquired north claims.Not so clear is whether the four newpositive magnetic features are on Copper Fox land.Perhaps a map of the “exploration interest” area was withheld to allowCUU to claim or acquire additional property (e.g. Paget Resources as astutely pointed out byimerc23)

Still of some confusion is whether the ES and GK zones aresubject to earn back agreement with Teck. The news release says that Copper Fox’s100% working interest is in 24,003 hectaresthat INCLUDES the Schaft Creek deposit on which Teck has an earn back option.Using the word “includes” implies that the SchaftCreek deposit (i.e. the earn-back) is only a part of the 24,003 hectares and the rest is not subject to earn-back (i.e. GK and ES). But then, the newsrelease goes on to say that the earn-back applies to “the Copper Fox interestin the Schaft Creek project.”The word “project”implies something bigger than the Schaft Creek deposit.

And then, the release goes on to say -- “Additionally CopperFox holds mineral claims totaling 3,947 hectares (9,752 acres) in the LiardMining District of BC not subject to the Teck earn-back.”

That's a clear statement. If the ES and GK zones are not subject to the Teckearn-back, one would expect a similar clear statement. Ambiguity exists! Can anyone clear this up.


Bullboard Posts