GREY:IPHAF - Post by User
Post by
tcdrugson Jun 24, 2011 12:16pm
658 Views
Post# 18761707
EMA decision
EMA decisionOnly one main study supported the application and the
results did not show in a robust way that Luveniq was more effective than placebo at reducing eye
inflammation, while no difference was seen in the patients’ eyesight compared with placebo. Luveniq
also caused side effects which are known to occur with this type of immunosuppressive medicine,
including hypertension (high blood pressure). Therefore, at that point in time, the CHMP was of the
opinion that the benefits of Luveniq had not been shown to outweigh its risks and recommended that it
be refused marketing authorisation.