Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Isotechnika Pharma Inc IPHAF



GREY:IPHAF - Post by User

Post by tcdrugson Jun 24, 2011 12:16pm
658 Views
Post# 18761707

EMA decision

EMA decision

Only one main study supported the application and the

results did not show in a robust way that Luveniq was more effective than placebo at reducing eye

inflammation, while no difference was seen in the patients’ eyesight compared with placebo. Luveniq

also caused side effects which are known to occur with this type of immunosuppressive medicine,

including hypertension (high blood pressure). Therefore, at that point in time, the CHMP was of the

opinion that the benefits of Luveniq had not been shown to outweigh its risks and recommended that it

be refused marketing authorisation.

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>