Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

CANDORADO OPERATING CO V.CDO



TSXV:CDO - Post by User

Comment by agrossfarmon Jun 24, 2011 12:43pm
138 Views
Post# 18761878

RE: GWR and CDO

RE: GWR and CDOVery good post, Wildman.

I need to point out that even back in 2008, CDO press releases apparently left a lot to be desired. They suggest more questions than they answer.

1. Where did they drill the holes? They don't say and don't show a map and have no information on the website.
2. Where is the map showing the soil copper trend (besides in their archives)?
3. where and how did they get 1.49% Cu and 8.1 g/t silver? Grab sample? Assay?
4. where are the assay results for the 4 holes that were drilled?
5. Why did they write "Results for the 2008 program will be released as they become available.Surface and core samples were submitted to Assayers Canada in Vancouverfor copper and multi-element analysis." but not release them?

One would think that the assays on those 4 holes, if they had even half as much mineralization, would have been released and the Market would have been interested...at least with a normal management that at least had some concern about the stock price. Given the lack of a report, the logical default conclusion is that there were no good assays to report.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>