Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Second Wave Petroleum Inc SCSZF



GREY:SCSZF - Post by User

Comment by binzer55on Jul 04, 2011 6:17pm
307 Views
Post# 18794248

RE: RE: RE: RE: kooteni

RE: RE: RE: RE: kooteniYour quote;
"You mention formation porosity on 3-4. I believe we were discussing 15-36 which is 6 miles away from 3-4. You cannot
logically claim that porosity's are the same."

The porosities are very similar throughout the unconventional plays in Swan Hills, let alone over the 6 mile distance you think is so important. But you should know that, since you have worked in "the patch" for 30 years.
And just where did they drill that second jv well? By gawd, it is down by the well I mentioned.
Maybe you should quit embarrassing yourself with your obvious lack of knowledge of what SCS is doing?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse