Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Granada Gold Mine Inc V.GGM

Alternate Symbol(s):  GBBFF

Granada Gold Mine Inc. is a Canada-based junior natural resource company. The principal business of the Company is the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral property interests. The Company is engaged in developing and exploring its 100% owned Granada Gold Property near Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec, which is adjacent to the Cadillac Break. The Granada Gold Property is located five kilometers south of the mining community of Rouyn-Noranda, Quebec. The property includes the former Granada Gold underground mine. The Company owns about 14.73 square kilometers of land from a combination of mining leases and claims. The Granada deposit is a quartz-vein mesothermal gold deposit hosted by late Archean Timiskaming sedimentary rock and younger syenite porphyry dykes.


TSXV:GGM - Post by User

Bullboard Posts
Comment by CarefulEyeon Jul 14, 2011 7:05pm
387 Views
Post# 18833246

RE: Buying..

RE: Buying..Hi Joakim,

Your knowledgeable posts here these past few weeks have been much appreciated.

As you have a background in geology, I wonder whether you can comment on a) Brent Cook's reservations about Granada, refusing to recommend GBB, apparently, because he feels there is too much waste material among interspersed "nuggets", and b)  the Casey's Research note from today that essentially expresses the same reservations, or at least fears, refusing to recommend buying because the recent NR contained  "no updated maps, sections, or other indications of how the higher-grade zones line up (if they do), or how much waste rock there is within the large mineralized area, it's hard to say how this will all hang together."

I know you have a detailed sense of where holes have been drilled and how they might connect. Can you just give us your response to comments such as those above? Do they have possible merit?

Many thanks.
Bullboard Posts

USER FEEDBACK SURVEY ×

Be the voice that helps shape the content on site!

At Stockhouse, we’re committed to delivering content that matters to you. Your insights are key in shaping our strategy. Take a few minutes to share your feedback and help influence what you see on our site!

The Market Online in partnership with Stockhouse