Cline Mining-the PATTERN
Geeesus ,I have to lead this "senior anal" by the hand ---like some blind dude.
1.First, 'senior anal," to qualify as junior anal ,or even as poster here
you have TO READ REPORTS OF REAL ANALYSTS-
who ,unlike you, know what they are talking about.
OBVIOUSLY ,you didn't .
So , shall we start a lesson # 2 in a looong string of lessons
which may eventually lead ,to you qualifying as a junior anal ?
You went through lesson # 1 already
"" Coal is formed from plant remains" LOOOOOOL
2. Second ,What kind of senior anal don't have access to brokers reports ?
$ 3 B hedge fund and senior anals have no access to major brokers reports ?
Or don't read them ? geeeeesus
What do you "analyze" besides your fantasies ?
What kind of fraud are you ?
Are you GOD's new incarnation / scam ?
geeesus ....here is RBC report - a
cheap version for poor ,fake "Senior-anals ."
https://www.stockhouse.com/Bullboards/MessageDetail.aspx?p=0&m=29960537&l=0&r=0&s=CMK&t=LIST
In 1/2 page you see there A STATEMENT OF A
SENIOR RBC ANAL ( Yes ..this one is real )
saying QUOTE :
" ,
the coke strength still remains uncertain,
and this is a key characteristic of coal that cannot be altered or changed through blending with other coals
The dudes here, keep hoping this problem can be fixed by blending. LOOOL
3. Third ,my dear "senior anal" LOL you are not even able to analyze
couple of SH posts ....geeesus.
GEEE and others based on RBC report SUSPECT that CMK coking coal
due to coke strength problem may not qualify for major steel furnaces .
AND BLENDING SHEIT WITH GOLD ( at a cost ) WON't HELP HERE .
Conclusion: the strength parameter is a disqualifier of all the other wonderful parameters.
May not QUALIFY AS COKING COAL for big furnaces = most clients
If it can withstand weight of a hod dog - then it qualifies as coking coal for hod dogs .Still coking coal , though ...LOL
Here are relevant GEE posts -- re- read them and try harder to understand them....anal
https://www.stockhouse.com/Bullboards/MessageDetail.aspx?s=CMK&t=LIST&m=29977263&l=0&pd=0&r=0&msg=3
There is cooking ( of your nuts as shareholder ) and COKING
in a way the furnace input won't collapse .
geeesus .... another idiot posturing as "senior - anal"
To what lows this BB can get ?
========================
Let me try again in case you still won't get it :
To qualify as "senior anal" you have to meet say ,10 criterions:
While 9 of them are "negotiable " can be met to a certain degree only
like
--to quack like anal
--to look like anal
-to -walk like anal
But 1 of those criterions is not negotiable - you have to have
strong anal brains.( the thing on the other end LOL)
Got it ?
You can still analyze a schedule of the anals who have brains, though
and still call yourself ' analyst " geeesus.
========================
This story is so typical of CMK ..OH- BTW there are different
definitions of a "cooking coal" - who would have thought of that ?
WHY a senior anal at RBC got this info to you after stock collapsed
and
CMK mngment did't communicate this before stock went into
speculative frenzy ?
Does this fall into a pattern of misleading,disclosing half -truths ,
and BS-ting ?
ANALYZE THE PATTERN ,please ..."senior anal."
APPLY PROBABILITIES OF THIS PERSISTENT PATTERN TO CONTINUE INTO FUTURE
...and you will arrive at CMK target of $ 1.5. and for years not higher than $ 2
https://www.stockhouse.com/Bullboards/MessageDetail.aspx?s=CMK&t=LIST&m=29979360&l=0&pd=0&r=0&msg=3
Note : CMK didn't correct / address / explain the strength problem ,even after the
Genie got out of the "secrecy bottle ".
Means only one thing :THEY DO HAVE STRENGTH PROBLEM>
Unlike you anal --- all across WEEEEEEEEAAAAAK .
.