Nothing but good news hereAffirmation of what was known historically, and as Quetzal derived a $20 stock based on what they reported.
They have listed all the "keywords" in their report. No problem that the share price dropped, but at some point, both big companies and big investors will have to realize- the next big gigs will be underwater, not on dry land. NUS leased property 4500m and down. Why? That is deep, deeper than Solwara, deeper than Atlantis II Deeps.
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/nautilus-awarded-exploration-tenements-in-eastern-pacific-2011-07-22?reflink=MW_news_stmp
I'm niave, but to me DFI, is "scooping up mud"- for the first 8m...sounds expensive only because someone throws out a cost of 80%, but sounds easy to permit. Sounds economically feasible, nonetheless. The resource is much greater- probably "open at depth..." When they dig deeper, this resource will become rediculous to calculate.
The only piece to the puzzle missing here is the willingness for investors to catch up to the reality that underwater mining is necessary. And, because investment isn't just based on tangible concerns, DFI reflects the idiocy of Wall Street. Manafa- deep pockets? Red Sea- environmentally permittable? The Resource - can innovation bring it to the surface? A2D, one of the first of many underwater ventures? C'mon big money. Grow a pair.