Just to add another recommendation from someone whI'm a physician. Skin cancer and skin rashes / lesions / nevi (moles) / changes...these are a real bugaboo for all of us, dermatologists or no...and not just for our patients, but for our families, friends, acquaintances that know we're docs, etc ("hey doc, can you take a look at this thing on my skin?).
I can attest to the fact that if our technology will actually and in reality prove out to be as sensitive and specific as ours looks to be, having one available will appeal to that part of all of us who have gone into medicine that wants to help people and make the diagnosis in time to prevent death and disability. Even the greediest sunovabeeeotch doc that went into medicine to "get rich" (you've really got to be an idiot to go into medicine for that...by my 10th HS reunion, there were guys in my class that had skipped college, become mngrs at McD's, made more money, gotten out of debt, bought their cottage at the lake with a nice powerboat, and were already much better off than I was by my 25th reunion, when I had finally paid off all my school / training debts.) has that place in him/her.
I see all these technologies with potential come and go, and I gave up a long time ago trying to figure out which ones would make it and make me money...guessed wrong enough times (generally not b/c of the need for the technology or drug or bench work, but b/c off the company often unforeseen financial problems, or some backroom deal that got another company in ahead, or some such thing) that I gave up on buying med-tech and even biotech stocks. I've made a big exception to the rule with Verisante (btw, is it pronounced Veri-santé?...as in French for "health"...?), and bought a bunch more at the lows yesterday. This excites me!!
All just my opinions and observations...gltal...jt
$^)