RE: RE: No Divvy NeededI'm the guy who made the original post, I'm a shareholder, I'm long, I'm not short, and I'm not lying. I have nothing against your idea of a special 20-cent divvy, but I'd rather see them keep the 40 mil and spend it on development of their new Canadian project. You may or may not be right that issuing a divvy would cause a short squeeze, but if they have to give away money as an inticement for people to buy their shares, I think there's a better inticement, namely acquisition and development of more projects to produce more revenue. As a shareholder, that's what I'd rather see, because that's what I think will do a better job of increasing the value of my shares. GLTA