RE: RE: Brent Cook On BNN What I found most interesting was that Brent once again said EVG RSH is a complicated formation (not his exact words). But just as interesting was that he thought Carlin could also be a major find. However, he also stated that he really did not understand the relationships EVG has with G or what the relationship is between AE EVG & Newmont.Maybe we have been barking up the wrong tree here & the real problem is managements & IR's inability or unwillingness to come forward & state just what these relationships are & how they will effect EVG going forward. If someone has Rories ear then maybe this could be brought up & management could put out a management statememt in the next Q report or at the AGM & clarify for us all what these seemingly complicated relationships bring to the table going forward. I will unable to do this myself due to some personal commitments so if someone feels comfortable talking with Rory perhaps they would be willing to t ake on the task & report back to the board. As I see it if a geologist/investor like Brent Cook (i Know he has his detractors here) has difficulty understanding these relationships then I believe clarification is clearly needed which might help investors understand the nature of their investment in EVG. All of my take on Brent Cooks appearance on BNN are not verbatum & from memory so I encourage everyone to go to the BNN web site & listen to his views yourself.